Devry Smith Frank LLP - dsf

By: Devry Smith And Frank  09-12-2011
Keywords: family lawyers

For most people, the term “custody” brings about thoughts of who will see the children when and how much time each parent will see the children after a separation.  In legal terms, “custody” has very little, if anything, to do with scheduling each parent’s time with the children.  Custody, in the legal sense, refers to who makes the important decisions regarding the children.

I am often asked, “What are the important decisions?”  The major decisions include decisions related to the children’s health, education, religion and extra-curricular activities.  The day-to-day decisions involving the children, such as what they will wear and eat, are typically made by the parent who is caring for the children on that particular day.  The major decisions, however, are made by the parent or parents with custody. 

Until a court order or a written agreement is made to the contrary, there is a presumption in law that both parents have custody of the children.  Both parents are presumed to start off on an equal footing once they separate (whether that is the reality or not is an entirely different issue!).  Joint custody means that the parents are able to co-parent together to make major decisions about the children mutually. 

Sole custody, on the other hand, involves only one parent making the important decisions about the children.  In most cases, a court order or written agreement is necessary for one parent to have sole custody.  In some cases, one parent may have what is called “de facto” custody, which means he or she may temporarily make the important decisions regarding the children solely, as a result of the other parent leaving the family or matrimonial home.  One should not assume, however, that as a result of the other parent leaving, he or she has sole custody.

Shared and split custody scenarios, although using the word “custody”, really have less to do with the decision making for the children and more to do with the time each parent has with the children and the effect on child support.  Shared custody, which is defined under section 9 of the Child Support Guidelines, is a situation when the children spend at least 40% of the time with each parent.  Split custody, as defined under section 8 of the Child Support Guidelines, involves a situation when each parent or spouse has custody of one or more children (i.e. the children are split up between each parent).  There are special rules that apply to these types of situations in terms of paying child support. 

Determining custody is often much more complex than what I have outlined here.  If you have recently separated and have children with your spouse, sorting out custody will likely be your main priority.  For assistance with this, please consult with one of our family lawyers and we will be happy to help you determine what is best for your children and your family.

Keywords: family lawyers

Contact Devry Smith And Frank


Print this page

Other products and services from Devry Smith And Frank


Devry Smith Frank LLP - termination

The assumption was that there are more higher level positions available than administrative jobs, which means that an employee seeking a new managerial job would typically take longer to find employment than a recently terminated administrative employee. Typically, an employee who worked in an executive, managerial or skilled position is entitled to a longer notice period than an employee whose job is clerical or administrative in nature.


Devry Smith Frank LLP - real estate

How would you like this to go?”Girouard responds to Druet by advising that he can have a sales and purchase agreement drafted for Druet’s review. Three hours later, Druet responds, “My partner has been in Peru the last few days and I just got to speak with him tonight about the condo. We await the final determination of this decision.It is not clear as to whether this case would have been decided differently in Ontario.


Devry Smith Frank LLP - human rights code

The Supreme Court of Canada recently considered the question of whether a party who has succeeded at a hearing at the Canadian Human Rights Commission should also be awarded a percentage of their legal expenses, to be paid by the other side.


Devry Smith Frank LLP - employment law

In a 2007 Ontario Superior Court of Justice case, Slepenkova v. Ivanov, the employee, who was employed as an “independent contractor” real estate agent for a firm operating under a brokerage, was deemed to be an employee for the purposes of determining reasonable notice upon termination of employment.


Devry Smith Frank LLP - articling student

As students-at-law we have been through the trenches to get where we are; undergraduate programs, LSAT exams, law school applications, three arduous years of schooling, bar exams and all the while with the general pursuit of landing a law firm job as the shining light at the end of the tunnel.